Promoting opportunities in this way works well – in the past, we had more than 800 people attending a free educational event!
I really appreciate you taking the time, without a big readership this entire series would not be possible!
Now, without further ado, let’s address a crucial topic that often lacks clear information:
What actually reduces energy consumption in your equipment—and how to implement it safely?
Today's Lesson: Reducing Energy Consumption
Understanding how to handle equipment differently
Number Of The Day
The PCR Mastercycler X50s requires 113.4 Wh per run. When the PCR run is over, it holds the temperature at 4°C, using 68 Wh per hour. Switching this temperature to +10°C can save approximately 48% of energy, as the cycler only needs 35 Wh per hour at this temperature. Notably, if the holding temperature is set to room temperature, it consumes just 11.8 Wh per hour.
48
Saving On Energy Consumption
Concrete information about the energy consumption of lab equipment is often missing.
And since electricity is often not considered a strongly limited resource, more advanced strategies beyond general tips on saving energy are rarely developed.
Certainly worth reading, containing previously unpublished data and outlinding safe & impactful solutions for you
This is why I teamed up with Eppendorf, writing a white paper with them. Based on the proprietary data they shared, there are some interesting lessons I thought I got to share with you:
The Challenge of Saving Energy
The difficulty in saving energy lies in the fact that you have to consider various processes to understand where savings are possible:
Energy consumption depends on multiple overlapping systems—cooling, heating, spinning, vacuum generation, and more.
Centrifuges are a perfect example.
Eppendorf’s microcentrifuge 5427 R (with a 30-place rotor) has the following consumption:
Cooling from room temp to +4 °C: 60 Wh
20 min spin at 20,000 × g at 4 °C: 130 Wh
Whereas their tabletop centrifuge 5910 Ri (with 6 × 50 mL rotor) uses:
Cooling from room temp to +4 °C: 1,000 Wh
60 min spin at 15,000 × g at 4 °C: 640 Wh
Therefor, saving energy could mean batching runs to avoid repeated cooling. But what about changing the spin? Yes, it will—but consider two things:
Initial acceleration uses more energy than maintaining the spin.
Not affecting your sample quality is the top priority.
So, instead of shortening spin steps or spinning at half g for 4x the time, it may be more effective to switch to a smaller centrifuge.
(How to reduce spinning times safely is something I share in our free Slack)
An Overlooked Option for Saving Energy
Eppendorf invested time and effort to measure the savings when turning freezers to -70 °C.
The data are based on Eppendorf-external tests with 3 empty units (230 V) in parallel and 20 °C room temperature.
They also explored how much energy can be saved by adjusting the holding temperature of their PCR cyclers. Setting it from +4 °C to +10 °C saves between 30–50%, depending on the model.
Please note that holding temperatures were set to +4°C. The 14h are my estimation of finishing the PCR at 6PM and turning it off at 8AM. This data was acquired for the PCR Mastercycler X40.
But have you ever considered how much energy your dry oven or cell incubator uses?
Take the CellXpert® C170i incubator:
Maintaining 37 °C: 37 Wh/h
Heat sterilization cycle: 3250 W
Steady use over a year (assuming minimal door opening) this equates to ~324 kWh, roughly as much as a small household.
For comparison, the witeg SmartLab SWOF dry oven consumes:
Maintaining 100°C: 187 Wh/h
Maintaining 150°C: 337 Wh/h
Still, we can use that equipment more sustainably by:
Limiting door openings
Regularly checking and cleaning seals
Choosing units with segmented doors to reduce heat loss and power demand
For incubators: Working cleanly to avoid excessive sterilization cycles—but not avoiding them altogether, as contamination is far more costly
An incubator with multiple segments, unfortunately though, I have only seen large upright drying ovens with segmentation… Let me know if you know about smaller ones with that feature.
Applying The Knowledge
We often focus on plastic waste because it’s visible.
In contrast, invisible energy consumption is often overlooked as a major contributor to lab carbon footprints—even though it can offer bigger opportunities for savings.
Therefore, measuring and sharing relatable comparisons is key to convincing colleagues to change.
The type on the left is the most common for laboratories. Of note, there are several other types such as DIN-Rail Smart Meters or Hardwired Units but those are for permanent installation. Of course, also plug-only types exist that send data to a phone app. Here is the link for the one on the right.
While instruments like MS or NMR machines can’t be turned off, you can often change settings—such as enabling sleep mode on your computer.
For devices like heating blocks, manual adjustment is possible.
For instance, the Eppendorf ThermoMixer® C consumes 110Wh/h at 65°C even when not in use.
If colleagues aren’t willing to turn it off, you might still convince them to reduce idle temperatures. (More on non-linear energy savings in our Slack)
Upcoming Lesson:
How Sustainability Data Is Evolving
How We Feel Today
If you have a wish or a question, feel free to reply to this Email. Otherwise, wish you a beatiful week! See you again the 22nd : )
Edited by Patrick Penndorf Connection@ReAdvance.com Lutherstraße 159, 07743, Jena, Thuringia, Germany Data Protection & Impressum If you think we do a bad job: Unsubscribe
Personal Note from Patrick, the Editor Hi Reader, how do you change protocols? Of course, step by step and by implementing the necessary controls. But how do you document those changes? Adding notes to your protocols is a highly useful but unfortunately often overlooked practice. So, here is when and how to do it: Today's Lesson: Note Taking in Protocols How and why documenting change makes a difference Number of the Day After properly assessing the startup time of their fusion fluxers...
Personal Note from Patrick, the Editor Hi Reader, what can help us to reduce over 90% of plastic waste - without switching to glass or changing processes? Dispendix has found a way - especially in sensitive processes such as the cleanup of next-generation sequencing workflows. They provided me with a deeper look into their solution through their sponsorship of this piece. Therefore, let me explain a unique approach to reducing time and error rates that minimizes environmental impact. Today's...
Personal Note from Patrick, the Editor Hi Reader, have you ever experienced a real supply shortage in science? When you cannot get the reagents or supplies you need, research stalls. It costs time, causes stress, and can even lead to instruments breaking down. However, in many developing countries, this is almost the norm: receiving supplies is frequently uncertain. Let’s therefore discuss how sustainable practices can help us survive these challenges. Today's Lesson: Sustainability Against...
