Hi Reader, today I have exciting innovations for you!
During my Bachelor’s, when I started to become interested in sustainability, I wondered:
Why aren’t companies helping scientists to be more sustainable?
As I found out a few Google searches later — they do.
And today, we will take a closer look at some of these examples from Corning Life Sciences - including free samples for you!
Why? As you know, Corning Life Sciences are sponsors of our summit and communications this year, so I was able to get a look behind the scenes for you:
Today's Lesson: Innovations That Save Plastic
How smart design makes our labs more sustainable
Number Of The Day
Based on a publication by De Paepe et al., purchasing and the associated Scope 3 emissions are the largest contributor to the carbon footprint of laboratories. They found that the average scientist generates 370g of CO₂e for every euro spent on consumables. Overall, this adds up to 6.2 tons of CO₂e per person per year. Now, imagine being able to cut that number by 23–70%... Yes - what you buy can make a huge difference.
370
Teaching Sustainability Effectively
The way to a greener future partially leads through different procurement choices—i.e., rethinking what you buy.
The ACT Ecolabel database is a valuable resource for finding footprint data on lab items, instruments, and chemicals. However, it's important to note that a labeled product is not necessarily sustainable—the ACT Ecolabel indicates the extent of its environmental impacts.
The reason this matters is Scope 3 emissions - meaning all emissions related to the creation, shipping, and end-of-life treatment of your items.
How to Make Change
In science, Scope 3 emissions often make up the biggest chunk of emissions.
Until recently, there were few alternatives to common single-use items in the lab—the main differentiator was price.
However, companies like Corning have set themselves the goal of paving the way for cleaner air, clearer water, and healthier generations to come through climate initiatives, sustainable design, and stewardship.
And in my mind, there are two innovations that really highlight this:
A New Culture Flask
I love the idea of the Corning® U-shaped Cell Culture Flask so much because it combines lower environmental impact with improved scientific processes.
What that means: due to the round shoulders and slimmer design, the he flask contains 23% less plastic. So you can use 5 U-75 flasks for the same amount of plastic and surface area as 4 of the T-75 flasks!
But even better, the rounded shoulders make cell scraping easier and more efficient.
This is what I mean when I say efficiency is the overlap of optimization and sustainability.
The surface area of 75 cm² stays the same, just like the sterility level and handling.
Bonus: One feature that shows Corning is thinking about scientists is the Pipet Divot.
That simply means you can keep the flask standing upright and pipette with one hand. Thanks to the broader opening, you can even access it with a 50 mL pipette - potentially allowing you to reuse the tip when handling large volumes.
I am very excited to offer you a free sample through Corning so you can try it out - love it!
Less Plastic for Your Tips
We talked about the impressive sustainability benefits of refill systems a few weeks ago. However, you can’t avoid using a rack—at least one.
And if you work with automated robotics, you likely need several.
The Axygen® HybridRack™ Pipette Tip Rack can help you reduce your impact by saving a staggering 70% plastic!
It was designed as a paperboard–plastic hybrid: paperboard to reduce plastic, and plastic to provide a strong, reusable base. This makes it robust enough for robotics while featuring a unique filter tip reload system.
Corning even went so far as to obtain the My Green Lab® ACT Ecolabel® for it - which you can check out here.
And beyond the 70% less plastic, the tips themselves have been dematerialized compared to traditional Axygen tip racks.
When I was working in cell culture, I used 4 flasks per week for my cells. An average flask weighs about 60 g. So switching to Corning flasks would save 2.76 kg of waste per year.
For this calculation, I assumed a total of 15 scientists actively working in the laboratory. However, since not everyone typically works in cell culture, I estimated that only 10 of them would use the U-shaped culture flasks. This might be a conservative estimate, but my aim here is to illustrate the potential savings — the percentages and proportional relationships remain the same regardless.
Now consider that for an entire group...
And all of that without any extra effort.
Similarly, for the tip racks:
According to Freese et al., one of their representative research groups used 144 000 tips per year, which translates to 1 500 tip boxes.
Assuming they don’t use refill systems, that means one could cut 84 kg of plastic waste just through tip boxes.
You often see companies creating flyers like this:
My tip: take a closer look—because they often contain innovations you wouldn’t expect!
Tip: Click to enlarge. Corning has put together a poster for you, considering three main categories for action: reducing energy use, choosing consumables that minimize waste, and optimizing lab processes to support sustainability. You can find more here.
And in case you haven't seen my post, here is a white paper for you:
This white paper provides an overview of sustainability challenges and explores solutions for waste management—without compromising efficiency or cost.
Upcoming Lesson:
Sustainability Resources For Your Lab
How We Feel Today
References
De Paepe, M., et al., 2024. Purchases dominate the carbon footprint of research laboratories. PLOS Sustain. Transform., 3(7), e0000116. doi:10.1371/journal.pstr.0000116.
Freese, A., et al., 2024. The relevance of sustainable laboratory practices. RSC Sustainability, 2, 1300–1336. doi:10.1039/D4SU00056K.
If you have a wish or a question, feel free to reply to this Email. Otherwise, wish you a beautiful week! See you again on the 9th : )
Edited by Patrick Penndorf Connection@ReAdvance.com Lutherstraße 159, 07743, Jena, Thuringia, Germany Data Protection & Impressum If you think we do a bad job: Unsubscribe
Personal Note from Patrick, the Editor Hi Reader, can you work more sustainably if you have validated procedures? Nobody who works in a regulated setting or follows a decade-old protocol wants to rework what has already been established. However, I think a few false assumptions hold people back far more than they should. Let me walk through a few places where I would drive change without much effort: Today's Lesson: Handling Regulation How to drive change without reworking SOPs & protocols....
Personal Note from Patrick, the Editor Hi Reader, many conversations about lab sustainability stop at "we should use less plastic." They rarely get to the point where someone actually tests whether reused plastic still gives you the same numbers at the bench. However, I am here to get you those numbers. So, let’s look at what is possible - specifically, through a paper that was published a few weeks ago: Today's Lesson: Is Reusing Really Safe? Assessing quality after multiple cleaning cycles...
Personal Note from Patrick, the Editor Hi Reader, chances are you have encountered this issue too. You want to drive change, but regulations and laws make it impossible. Or do they? Here’s what you should know about “impossible changes” and how you might get around them: Today's Lesson: Handling Guidelines Well Why a direct look at the paperwork makes sense Number of the Day There are several dozen guidelines for proper scientific conduct and manufacturing practices. For example, the ICH Q...
